An IT quality indicator must support a decision
A useful KPI does more than simply report a situation. It connects an objective, a data source, a review frequency, an owner and a possible action. Without this chain, the indicator becomes a figure discussed in meetings but rarely used as a decision-making tool.
Before adding an indicator to a dashboard, three questions must therefore be answered: which decision should it inform, which data can be used to calculate it, and what action should be taken if the result falls outside the expected range? This check prevents the creation of overloaded dashboards that give an impression of control without helping teams set priorities.
What to define before measuring
Each indicator must be described precisely enough to be understood, produced and discussed without varying interpretations. Its definition sheet should specify the objective, calculation method, source, frequency, owner, interpretation limits and associated action.
An availability rate, for example, does not have the same significance depending on whether it excludes planned maintenance and whether it covers all applications or only critical services. A resolution time does not have the same meaning if incidents are incorrectly classified or tickets are closed without validation from business teams.
Examples of actionable indicators
| Indicator | What it measures | Source | Frequency | Interpretation / threshold | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical service availability | The service’s ability to remain accessible throughout the monitored period | Monitoring systems, operations logs | Monthly or weekly depending on criticality | Threshold defined by the expected service level | Prioritise remediation, continuity or capacity |
| Average resolution time | Time between incident classification and resolution | ITSM tool or incident register | Weekly or monthly | Review by criticality, never solely as an overall average | Review escalation, support or documentation |
| Business request backlog | Volume and age of requests awaiting prioritisation | Request portfolio, PMO | Monthly | Analysis by age and priority | Prioritise, consolidate or close requests |
| Master data quality | Completeness and consistency of data used by processes | ERP, CRM, CMMS, data quality checks | Monthly or before a project milestone | Threshold specific to the process and business risk | Launch targeted remediation before migration or reporting |
| Compliance with a key process | Share of cases following the approved workflow | Workflow, activity log, sample audit | Monthly or quarterly | Assess deviations alongside the causes of exceptions | Provide training, simplify or correct the process |
Measure, assess, decide
Measuring means producing a reliable figure. Assessing means explaining what that figure shows. Deciding means changing a priority, process, resource or control based on that assessment. An IT quality dashboard must organise these three levels rather than simply accumulating charts.
The steering committee must therefore distinguish between monitoring indicators, prioritisation indicators and progress indicators. A monitoring indicator triggers an alert. A prioritisation indicator helps decision-makers choose between several priorities. A progress indicator shows whether an action that has already been approved is producing an observable effect.
Common mistakes
The first mistake is selecting KPIs because they are easy to produce. Available data is not necessarily useful. The second is combining situations that are too different: an overall average can conceal a critical service that is experiencing difficulties. The third is tracking an indicator without an identified owner, preventing any action from being taken.
Another common mistake is setting a universal threshold. A threshold depends on the context, service criticality, maturity level, accepted risk and available resources. The purpose of defining an IT quality framework is to make these choices explicit.
Connect KPIs to quality governance
An indicator becomes useful when it is connected to a regular review, an action plan and clear accountability. To define the right indicators, improve source reliability, establish a review cycle and turn findings into monitored decisions, see our quality consulting services.
When indicators relate to business applications, they may also need to be aligned with IT project advisory and scoping: data quality, acceptance criteria, service levels, target processes and the role of business teams in validation.
Do you need to make an IT quality dashboard more reliable or turn your indicators into genuinely actionable tools? Discuss your IT quality indicators.
Related articles
ERP After a Merger: Business Decisions Before System Configuration
One ERP does not, by itself, create one operating model. After a merger, implementation support should make convergence choices, decision rights, and unresolved dependencies explicit—before they become configuration assumptions.
Read article ResourceQHSE, performance and internal control: building engagement in a public port organisation
In large public port organisations, QHSE and performance management are not about piling up controls or claiming full compliance. OLING provides an internal control framework that clarifies roles, focuses on priority control points and formalises approval workflows suited to operational realities. This progressive approach, centred on concrete deliverables, helps overcome internal inertia and build lasting engagement.
Read article ResourceTerritorial data portal: structure the roadmap, avoid fragmentation and establish sustainable governance
Designing a territorial data portal is not merely a technical challenge. Without robust governance, clear priorities and ongoing oversight, efforts can become diluted and dependencies excessive. Through its outsourced CIO practice, OLING helps turn this type of initiative into a strategic enabler by sequencing workstreams, formalising decisions and safeguarding long-term progress.
Read article ResourceCustom CRM: structuring cybersecurity and governing without illusion or unnecessary exposure
When implementing a custom CRM, cybersecurity cannot be reduced to a checklist or a promise of absolute protection. OLING offers a structured, pragmatic approach focused on prioritising key issues, producing streamlined deliverables and managing communications to ensure credible governance without unnecessary exposure.
Read article